home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Amiga Plus 1995 #5 & #6
/
Amiga Plus CD - 1995 - No. 5 and 6.iso
/
pd
/
grafik
/
lightwave
/
lightwave-jan95
/
000159_owner-lightwave-l _Wed Jan 18 03:44:25 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-02-04
|
1KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom6.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id VAA17140; Tue, 17 Jan 1995 21:21:06 -0800
Received: from arl-img-1.compuserve.com by mail.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id PAA09951; Tue, 17 Jan 1995 15:25:26 -0800
Received: by arl-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.9/5.941228sam)
id SAA14606; Tue, 17 Jan 1995 18:23:49 -0500
Date: 17 Jan 95 18:19:00 EST
From: "Stan S. Shumlick" <71612.1725@compuserve.com>
To: <lightwave-l@netcom.com>
Subject: Real specs on rendering
Message-ID: <950117231859_71612.1725_DHN48-1@CompuServe.COM>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
OK, So I've heard all the "my system is better than your system"
arguments. Is there an independent testing facility that can actually
prove any of these claims? Is there some sort of FAQ or info file that us
end-user types can peruse at our leisure? I for one would like to see some
sort of published information about DEC Alpha's and the MIPS actual
benchmarks.
I don't want to start another flame war. I just want some unbiased
information about these systems.
Cheers,
Stan Shumlick